References for “social psychology’s crisis of confidence”

back to essay

Allport, G. W. (1968). The historical background of modern social psychology (part 1). In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1–80). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Baumeister, R. F. (2016). Charting the future of social psychology on stormy seas: Winners, losers, and recommendations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.003

Begley, C. G., & Ellis, L. M. (2012). Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature, 483, 531–533.

Bem, D. J. (2003). Writing the empirical journal article. In J. M. Dar- ley, M. P. Zanna, & H. L. Roediger III (Eds.), The compleat academic: A career guide (pp. 171–201). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Bem, D. J. (2011). Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 407–425. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0021524

Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475

Collaboration, O. S. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716-aac4716. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University.

Dovidio, J. F. (2016). Commentary: A big problem requires a foundational change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.01.008

Ebersole, C. R., Axt, J. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Scientists’ Reputations Are Based on Getting It Right, Not Being Right. PLoS Biology, 14(5), 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002460

Elms, A. C. (1975). The crisis of confidence in social psychology. American Psychologist, 30(10), 967–976. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.30.10.967

Engber, D. (2017, May). Darrl Bem Proved EPS Is Real. Slate, 1–22. Retrieved from https://slate.com/health-and-science/2017/06/daryl-bem-proved-esp-is-real-showed-science-is-broken.html

Fetterman, A. K., & Sassenberg, K. (2015). The reputational consequences of failed replications and wrongness admission among scientists. PLoS ONE, 10(12), 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143723

Feynman, R. P. (1974). Cargo Cult Science. Engineering and Science, 33, 10–13. Retrieved from http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechES:37.7.CargoCult

Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., & Reis, H. T. (2015). Best Research Practices in Psychology: Illustrating Epistemological and Pragmatic Considerations With the Case of Relationship Science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(2), 275–297.

Gardner, W., Lidz, C. W., & Hartwig, K. C. (2005). Authors’ reports about research integrity problems in clinical trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 26(2), 244–251.

Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2013). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis.

Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26(2), 309–320. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0034436

Giner-sorolla, R. (2012). Science or Art ? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 562–571. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612457576

Greenwald, A. G. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 1–20.

Hales, A. H. (2016). Does the conclusion follow from the evidence? Recommendations for improving research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.011

Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. http://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009

Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, e124.

Kahneman, D. (2012). Open Letter: A proposal to deal with questions about priming effects.

Kaplan, R. M., & Irvin, V. L. (2015). Likelihood of null effects of large NHLBI clinical trials has increased over time. PLoS ONE, 10(8), 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132382

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press

John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953

Kaplan, R. M., & Irvin, V. L. (2015). Likelihood of null effects of large NHLBI clinical trials has increased over time. PLoS ONE, 10(8), 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132382

Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers volume 1. (J. Worrall & G. Currie, Eds.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Ledgerwood, A. (2016). Introduction to the Special Section on Improving Research Practices: Thinking Deeply Across the Research Cycle. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 661–663. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616662441

Martin, G. N., & Clarke, R. (2017). Are psychology journals anti-replication? A snapshot of editorial practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(April), 523. http://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2017.00523

McGuire, W. J. (1967). Some impending reorientations in social psychology: Some thoughts provoked by Kenneth Ring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 124–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(67)90017-0

McGuire, W. J. (1973). The yin and yang of progress in social psychology: Seven koan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26(3), 446–456. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0034345

Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38(4), 379–387. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.4.379

Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Percie, N., … Wagenmakers, E. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Publishing Group, 1(January), 1–9. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021

Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2017). The Preregistration Revolution. Unpublished Manuscript. Retrieved from https://osf.io/2dxu5/

Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058

Popper, K. (1934). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Routledge.

Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.

Rozin, P. (2001). Social Psychology and Science: Some Lessons From Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(1), 2–14. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0501_1

Sakaluk, J. K. (2016). Exploring Small, Confirming Big: An alternative system to The New Statistics for advancing cumulative and replicable psychological research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.013

Schlenker, B. R. (1974). Social psychology and science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(1), 1–15. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0035668

Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E. C., … Nosek, B. A. (2017, September 21). Many analysts, one dataset: Making transparent how variations in analytical choices affect results. Retrieved from psyarxiv.com/qkwst

Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–66. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632

Simonsohn U. 2013. Just post it: the lesson from two cases of fabricated data detected by statisics alone. Psychological Science, 24, 1875-88.

Spellman, B. A. (2014). A Short (Personal) Future History of Revolution 2.0. Psychological Science, 10(6), 886–898. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615609918

Stangor, C., & Lemay, E. P. (2016). Introduction to the Special Issue on Methodological Rigor and Replicability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4–6. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.006

Wicherts, J. M., Bakker, M., & Molenaar, D. (2011). Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results. PLoS ONE, 6(11), 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026828

Wicherts, J. M., Borsboom, D., Kats, J., & Molenaar, D. (2006). The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. The American Psychologist, 61(7), 726–728. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.726

Yong, E. (2012). Replication studies: Bad copy. Nature, 485(7398), 298–300. http://doi.org/10.1038/485298a

Advertisements