References for “social psychology’s crisis of confidence”

back to essay

Allport, G. W. (1968). The historical background of modern social psychology (part 1). In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1–80). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Baumeister, R. F. (2016). Charting the future of social psychology on stormy seas: Winners, losers, and recommendations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

Begley, C. G., & Ellis, L. M. (2012). Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature, 483, 531–533.

Bem, D. J. (2003). Writing the empirical journal article. In J. M. Dar- ley, M. P. Zanna, & H. L. Roediger III (Eds.), The compleat academic: A career guide (pp. 171–201). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Bem, D. J. (2011). Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 407–425.

Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376.

Collaboration, O. S. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716-aac4716.

Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University.

Dovidio, J. F. (2016). Commentary: A big problem requires a foundational change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1–7.

Ebersole, C. R., Axt, J. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Scientists’ Reputations Are Based on Getting It Right, Not Being Right. PLoS Biology, 14(5), 1–7.

Elms, A. C. (1975). The crisis of confidence in social psychology. American Psychologist, 30(10), 967–976.

Engber, D. (2017, May). Darrl Bem Proved EPS Is Real. Slate, 1–22. Retrieved from

Fetterman, A. K., & Sassenberg, K. (2015). The reputational consequences of failed replications and wrongness admission among scientists. PLoS ONE, 10(12), 1–13.

Feynman, R. P. (1974). Cargo Cult Science. Engineering and Science, 33, 10–13. Retrieved from

Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., & Reis, H. T. (2015). Best Research Practices in Psychology: Illustrating Epistemological and Pragmatic Considerations With the Case of Relationship Science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(2), 275–297.

Gardner, W., Lidz, C. W., & Hartwig, K. C. (2005). Authors’ reports about research integrity problems in clinical trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 26(2), 244–251.

Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2013). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis.

Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26(2), 309–320.

Giner-sorolla, R. (2012). Science or Art ? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 562–571.

Greenwald, A. G. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 1–20.

Hales, A. H. (2016). Does the conclusion follow from the evidence? Recommendations for improving research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, e124.

Kahneman, D. (2012). Open Letter: A proposal to deal with questions about priming effects.

Kaplan, R. M., & Irvin, V. L. (2015). Likelihood of null effects of large NHLBI clinical trials has increased over time. PLoS ONE, 10(8), 1–12.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press

John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532.

Kaplan, R. M., & Irvin, V. L. (2015). Likelihood of null effects of large NHLBI clinical trials has increased over time. PLoS ONE, 10(8), 1–12.

Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers volume 1. (J. Worrall & G. Currie, Eds.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Ledgerwood, A. (2016). Introduction to the Special Section on Improving Research Practices: Thinking Deeply Across the Research Cycle. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 661–663.

Martin, G. N., & Clarke, R. (2017). Are psychology journals anti-replication? A snapshot of editorial practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(April), 523.

McGuire, W. J. (1967). Some impending reorientations in social psychology: Some thoughts provoked by Kenneth Ring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 124–139.

McGuire, W. J. (1973). The yin and yang of progress in social psychology: Seven koan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26(3), 446–456.

Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38(4), 379–387.

Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Percie, N., … Wagenmakers, E. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Publishing Group, 1(January), 1–9.

Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2017). The Preregistration Revolution. Unpublished Manuscript. Retrieved from

Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631.

Popper, K. (1934). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Routledge.

Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.

Rozin, P. (2001). Social Psychology and Science: Some Lessons From Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(1), 2–14.

Sakaluk, J. K. (2016). Exploring Small, Confirming Big: An alternative system to The New Statistics for advancing cumulative and replicable psychological research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

Schlenker, B. R. (1974). Social psychology and science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(1), 1–15.

Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E. C., … Nosek, B. A. (2017, September 21). Many analysts, one dataset: Making transparent how variations in analytical choices affect results. Retrieved from

Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–66.

Simonsohn U. 2013. Just post it: the lesson from two cases of fabricated data detected by statisics alone. Psychological Science, 24, 1875-88.

Spellman, B. A. (2014). A Short (Personal) Future History of Revolution 2.0. Psychological Science, 10(6), 886–898.

Stangor, C., & Lemay, E. P. (2016). Introduction to the Special Issue on Methodological Rigor and Replicability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4–6.

Wicherts, J. M., Bakker, M., & Molenaar, D. (2011). Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results. PLoS ONE, 6(11), 1–7.

Wicherts, J. M., Borsboom, D., Kats, J., & Molenaar, D. (2006). The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. The American Psychologist, 61(7), 726–728.

Yong, E. (2012). Replication studies: Bad copy. Nature, 485(7398), 298–300.